|
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
We were unable to send your email.
Click here to try again.
This atheist finds he needs a foxhole
By
Robyn E. Blumner, Times Columnist
In print: Sunday, May 4, 2008
|
Jeremy Hall collects his thoughts at a coffee shop near Fort Riley, Kan., where he has been assigned a bodyguard for his own protection.
|
 |
|
[Associated Press]
|
Maybe the reason the misperception persists that there are no atheists in foxholes is that nonbelievers must either shut up about their views or be hounded out of the military. Just ask Army Spc. Jeremy Hall, who is making a splash in the news because of the way his atheism was attacked by superiors and fellow soldiers while he was risking his life in service to his country. Hall, 23, served two combat tours in Iraq, winning the Combat Action Badge. But he's now stationed at Fort Riley, Kan., having been returned stateside early because the Army couldn't ensure his safety. There is something deeply amiss when we send soldiers on a mission to engender peaceful coexistence between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, yet our military doesn't seem able to offer religious tolerance to its own. Hall recounts the events that led to his marginalization in a federal lawsuit he filed in March in Kansas. Hall is joined by the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, a group devoted to assisting members of the military who object to the pervasive and coercive Christian proselytizing in our armed forces. Hall's atheism became an issue soon after it became known. On Thanksgiving 2006 while stationed outside Tikrit, Hall politely declined to join in a Christian prayer before the holiday meal. The result was a dressing down by a staff sergeant who told him that as an atheist he needed to sit somewhere else. In another episode, after his gun turret took a bullet that almost found an opening, the first thing a superior wanted to know was whether Hall believed in Jesus now, not whether he was okay. Then, in July, while still in Iraq, Hall organized a meeting of the Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers. According to Hall, after things began, Maj. Freddy Welborn disrupted the meeting with threats saying he might bring charges against Hall for conduct detrimental to good order and discipline, and that Hall was disgracing the Constitution. (Err, I think the major has that backward.) Welborn has denied the allegations, but the New York Times reports that another soldier at the meeting said that Hall's account was accurate. Hall claims that he was denied a promotion in part because he wouldn't be able to "pray with his troops." And of course he was returned from overseas due to physical threats from fellow soldiers and superiors. Things became so bad that he was assigned a full-time bodyguard. This is nothing new to Mikey Weinstein, founder of MRFF and a former Air Force judge advocate general who also served in the Reagan administration. Weinstein says that he has collected nearly 8,000 complaints, mostly from Christian members of the military tired of being force-fed a narrow brand of evangelical fundamentalism. Weinstein, who co-wrote the book With God on Our Side: One Man's War Against an Evangelical Coup in America's Military, has documented how the ranks of our military have been infiltrated by members of the Officers' Christian Fellowship and other similar organizations. On its Web site, the OCF makes no secret of its mission which is to "raise up a godly military" by enlisting "ambassadors for Christ in uniform." Weinstein says recruitment is easy in a strict command-subordinate military where the implied message is, if you don't pray the right way, your career might stall. Beyond the mincemeat being made of church-state separation and religious liberty, it seems particularly combustible for our armed forces to be combining "end-times" Christian theology with military might. That's no way to placate Muslim populations around the world. But there's no will for change. The military's virulent religious intolerance could be eradicated tomorrow with swift sanctions against transgressors. Instead, it's winked at and those caught proselytizing suffer no consequence. It appears that brave men like Hall, who simply wish to follow the dictates of their own conscience, will be needing bodyguards for a long time to come.
[Last modified: May 08, 2008 10:55 AM]
Comments on this article
|
by John
|
May 8, 2008 10:55 AM
|
|
We are supposedly fighting a war against theocratic religious zealots
in Afganistan. We now fight this same anti-American intolerance in our own military.Does anyone not see the irony in this situation?
|
|
by Ken
|
May 7, 2008 11:39 AM
|
|
This is nothing new. During my 4 years in the Marine Corps (1959-63), I was advised that a real marine was a protestant and a republican. It is hard when you don't fit in.
|
|
by Andrew
|
May 7, 2008 11:35 AM
|
|
When your Soul is at stake, for a ETERNITY of DAMNATION, It is every Christians duty to try to bring you to the light. Anything you suffer now is better than burning in Hell! It's for your own good!
|
|
by Deborah
|
May 7, 2008 11:26 AM
|
|
Disheartening,discouraging. Where are logic and reason? We are devolving to a flat Earth, creationist, geocentric universe. Is this what Jesus would have done? I don't think so!!I am a mostly in the closet atheist myself. It's too risky to
|
|
by Charlene
|
May 7, 2008 11:24 AM
|
|
Yeah, Jeremy. You hang in there. I'm glad someone has the balls to stand up to them. My dad was in the Navy and we asked him why he stayed on base to go to church on Sunday. He said because he would never get promoted if he did not!
|
|
by barbara
|
May 6, 2008 1:50 PM
|
|
Isn't it amazing that a person risking his life for his country,without some vision of eternal reward, could need protection from his country!
|
|
by Robert
|
May 5, 2008 6:52 PM
|
|
I would suggest to all of those who have made a comment to many of the books written by Thomas Paine.
R
|
|
by Wally
|
May 5, 2008 2:56 PM
|
|
I guess freedom of religion doesn't include the freedom to want no religion. I'll need to check my constitution on that one.
|
|
by Allan
|
May 5, 2008 2:55 PM
|
|
This shocks Ms. Blumner, but it doesn't shock or surprise me one bit. As a 43-years-long anti-imperialist socialist, and a 42-years-long atheist, I've long known about the WASP (white, Anglo-Saxon Protest
|
|
by Shan
|
May 5, 2008 2:55 PM
|
|
w-h-a-c-k-y is an unusual spelling of "unconstitutional," Lin. :o)
|
|
by billy
|
May 5, 2008 2:54 PM
|
|
when will the hyper-religious accept that many people just don't buy their line? the most hyper-religious evangelicals that i meet would never sway me to accept their version of jesus. i never fail to tell them that, and they get qui
|
|
by Paul
|
May 5, 2008 2:31 PM
|
|
Fear of the possibility that the atheists could be right leads to intolerance, persecution and hypocrisy. This reaction hardly speaks well of the depth of their faith.
|
|
by Dennis
|
May 5, 2008 2:16 PM
|
|
What a scary scenario. Something we all need to be aware of. Kudo's to you Robyn.
|
|
by Gerry
|
May 5, 2008 2:10 PM
|
|
All this from an organization whose purpose is to violate the commandment "Thou shalt not kill." Didn't Ghandi say that Christians are the only people who don't understand that Jesus was a pacifist?
|
|
by Will
|
May 5, 2008 2:08 PM
|
|
Conservatives are ruining this country.
|
|
by A.H.
|
May 5, 2008 1:55 PM
|
|
This is ridiculous. He doesn't want to pray, so he needs a body guard? This is one reason why I'm agnostic. I don't need anyone to tell me what to believe in or what/who to pray to. My life, my choice. Shut up, thumpers.
|
|
by Eric
|
May 5, 2008 1:54 PM
|
|
Being an atheist raised in the southern bible belt I am not suprised at all. The typical Christian fundamentalist is the American version of the Taliban.
|
|
by Beliver
|
May 5, 2008 1:36 PM
|
|
The staff sergeant should be broken of his power. Who's he to decide what other Americans should believe? Maj. Freddy Welborn should be court marshaled for using his authority to require conformity to his religious views.
|
|
by Powers
|
May 5, 2008 1:23 PM
|
|
Disgusting.
|
|
by Guy
|
May 5, 2008 1:19 PM
|
|
A Christian, evangelical, fundamentalist military in the heart of the Muslim holyland. What could possibly go wrong here? Good thing Reaganomics is in the process of tanking the economy, so I have something to distract me from this looming disaster.
|
|
by KGH
|
May 4, 2008 12:13 PM
|
|
In the mid 80s, the least reverent designation allowed on dog tags was "no(religious)preference." In basic training you did not have to attend services on Sunday if you didn't want. You could stay in the barracks and clean
|
|
by Lin
|
May 4, 2008 11:44 AM
|
|
This is whacky.Our military shouldn't behave like this.Sounds like the newspaper I worked for, the publisher & editor took me to Red Lobster & the publisher prayed aloud over our meal.Grief!
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
|