Today's paper | eEdition | Subscribe
The Truth-O-Meter
Latest print edition
St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Recipient email
You may enter up to 20 multiple email addresses, separated by commas.
Your message

Clearwater council right to leave Scientology protests alone


In print: Thursday, May 15, 2008


Social Bookmarking
Digg Facebook Stumbleupon
Reddit Del.icio.us Newsvine
ADVERTISEMENT

The Clearwater City Council took mere seconds Tuesday to deliver a powerful message: that people have the right to peacefully assemble and speak their minds, and the city won't even consider trying to tread on that right.

Thirty-four downtown merchants and two residents signed a petition calling for the city government to take action against Anonymous, a loosely organized, Internet-based group that has been conducting worldwide protests against the Church of Scientology for months. Since the first of the year, the group has led four weekend protests in downtown Clearwater, where the Church of Scientology has its spiritual headquarters and a massive presence. Another protest is planned for June 14.

The protests in Clearwater have been peaceful, without a single arrest, but they do look a bit bizarre. The protesters wear masks or bandannas to cover their faces because they believe the Church of Scientology will target them if they are recognizable. It is not an idle fear, since in the past the church has been accused of using private investigators to follow critics or contacting their employers.

Downtown Clearwater merchants who signed the petition told the St. Petersburg Times that the protests are keeping away customers and the masked protesters look scary to children. The Church of Scientology also has objected to the tenor of the protests, accusing Anonymous of using hate speech — signs carried by protesters often refer to Scientology as a cult or a scam — and claiming that Anonymous members have phoned in death threats to the church and attacked the church's computer systems.

However, Clearwater police have closely monitored the Anonymous protests, and they have seen no reason to arrest or cite the protesters.

Anonymous organizers say they have not blocked customers from entering downtown businesses and that no one has any reason to fear the protesters, who generally have numbered from 50 to about 200 — nowhere near the estimated 3,000 Scientologists who, in 1997, marched around downtown in a surprise mass demonstration against the Clearwater Police Department and the St. Petersburg Times. At least Anonymous provides plenty of advance notice of its demonstrations.

Scientologists had the right to speak their minds on the streets of Clearwater in 1997. And Anonymous has the right to do so in 2008. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to free speech and peaceably assemble, and it declares that government may make no laws abridging those rights.

While the tactics of Anonymous members or supporters have not always been laudatory in other parts of the world, in Clearwater, they have done nothing to warrant government intervention. They may express views that Scientologists find objectionable, but Scientology expresses views that others object to as well. Both sides have the right to express their viewpoints peacefully.

The City Council's response to the merchants' petition was exactly right.



[Last modified: May 21, 2008 09:29 AM]



Comments on this article
by Earl May 15, 2008 5:20 PM
This is the beginning of the end for the malicious corporation masquerading as a "church". I for one will join with Anonymous for the next protest. After more than 30 years of cult intimidation, the time has come to take back our town.
by Local May 15, 2008 5:20 PM
The SPTimes keeps stirring the pot, if all were to just ignore the situation it would go away. Quite frankly I am sick of the entire thing. This is clearly an abuse of what our rights were directed at. This is making a charade of the 1st amendment
by Valerie May 15, 2008 8:35 AM
I did not move to Clearwater specifically because of the Scientology take over of your town. Clearwater should consider the negative impact of this cult on its image as well as business.
by David May 15, 2008 8:35 AM
Perhaps if those business owners had not put up signs saying "Customers not welcome" or whatever, they might get more business. Just a thought.
by Glenn May 15, 2008 8:35 AM
I just want to say thanks to all the protesters! It's about time someone did something about those people! Maybe I'll join you next protest....
by Guerilla May 15, 2008 8:35 AM
We have documentation that a large majority of petitioners are scientologists. Coupled with photos of the "No Anonymous" signs in the windows. And as for hecklers if they are in starbucks they have no mask, and no mask no means they aren't anonymous.
by anon1970 May 15, 2008 8:34 AM
Steve, can a Scientologist tell the truth for once? I call Starbucks and spoke with both store managers and they say the incident you mention never happened. Their words were "we have never had any problems with Anonymous"
by Dan May 15, 2008 8:34 AM
Wow. The St Pete Times has grown a spine! Recent editorials have criticized the poor judgment and bad policy of the city of Clearwater, and now we get a well-deserved stern rebuke of Scientology. Well done. Keep up the pressure.
by Anon May 15, 2008 8:34 AM
Outstanding news! Let's hope that the Philadelphia council takes the same initiative and stops Scientology from filing bogus "protest permits" in front of their own building to stop Philly Anons from protesting there!
by 612 May 15, 2008 8:34 AM
Perhaps the Corporation should remember that telling your members to stand outside of their businesses glaring at any protester who passes also scares children.
by Sally May 15, 2008 8:34 AM
Well Done Clearwater!! The church of $cientology loves to quote their "rights" while denying same to their members and neighbors. Thank You City Council for not playing their game!
by Steve May 15, 2008 8:34 AM
"world wide" protests? Wow. I did not know that so many people took this so seriously. What exactly is this "church" trying to hide by getting some of their own parishoners to sign a petition against peaceful protestors?
by David May 15, 2008 8:33 AM
To Steve: Starbucks may have done something about two particularly noisy protesters, but Starbucks continues to accept protester's business, and Starbucks was NOT a signatory to the petition. The petitioners were all in some way Scientology related.
by Mary May 15, 2008 8:33 AM
It's very encouraging to see that the Clearwater City Council and police dept are not adhering to Scientology hyperbole of calling all Anonymous critics "criminals" Thanks for honoring these essential constitutional and civil rights for protesters.
by roger May 15, 2008 8:33 AM
Scientology will get more and more of the bad reputation it has always deserved since it tries to silence its critics - which is one of the major reasons why it is criticized!!
by Jack May 15, 2008 8:33 AM
To Steve: So it's justifiable to prohibit the constitutional rights of over 200 people due to two *alleged* bad eggs? I think not.
by Christine May 15, 2008 8:32 AM
What is ironic is that these businesses placed signs in their windows saying they would not serve anons. And then complain that they're losing money. Lol, wut?
by Bill May 15, 2008 8:32 AM
Hey Steve, How can the manager throw them out when they were out already? Is that the same Starbucks that the Scilons are boycotting because they won't put up a "no-anons" sign as the scientologists requested?
by anon May 15, 2008 8:32 AM
Free Speech 1 Scientology 0
by Stephen May 15, 2008 8:32 AM
Maybe now Scientology will understand that, just as they had the right to dress in nazi uniforms and protest by the thousands in Clearwater in 1997, Anonymous has the right to put on masks and protest peacefully NOW. Thank you Clearwater!
by David May 15, 2008 8:32 AM
Steve: The Clearwater Police Department were all over that street the entire day and the day of every previous protest. They were watching the protesters like hawks. Do you think they'd stand idly by while that happened? I find your story doubtful.
by Dave May 15, 2008 8:31 AM
Scientology must be disappointed that Clearwater still is bound by the Constitution of the USA. Freedom of speech terrifies them.
by tim May 15, 2008 8:31 AM
Hey LRon, don't tase the SP Times!
by Redcoat May 15, 2008 8:07 AM
Fantastic! This Cult is dying, and it must be put down. Throw Miscaviage in prison and release the brainwashed to the real world.
by Kaycee May 14, 2008 9:07 PM
YAY ANONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by Anon May 14, 2008 9:05 PM
The CoS needs to learn that constitutional rights do not apply exclusively to themselves. Their tendency to abuse their own rights while trying to suppress those of others suggest that they have yet to figure this out.
by Gerald May 14, 2008 9:04 PM
I couldn't agree more. I, for one, am getting sick-and-tired watching scientology try to bully to get its way in Clearwater. I hope these protesters keep it up. Good job.
by Skeptic May 14, 2008 9:03 PM
Excellent article!
by Anne May 14, 2008 9:03 PM
Of course, the petition neglected to mention that all the businesses were run by Scientologists...
by Steve May 14, 2008 9:03 PM
Not true. I was at Starbucks sitting quietly during the protest. Two anon supports where under the outside awning, screaming and taunting the Scientologists who walked by. I complained to the manager who tossed them out. Just one example.
by Anonymous May 14, 2008 9:02 PM
WIN
by Marcie May 14, 2008 9:02 PM
Let us not forget that those are the same merchants that put up signs saying they would not serve or allow protesters, then complain that they don't get any business due to the protests.
by Marc May 14, 2008 9:02 PM
The CoS is FAIL at attempting to deny their critics their freedom of speech and I laugh at them. Those scientologists trying to infringe on such freedoms should be VERY ashamed of themselves. FLUNK!!!
by Snoware May 14, 2008 9:02 PM
Anonymous members are not terrorists, they have not sent bomb threats, they have not threatened Scientology members or their facilities. The boy has cried wolf many times too often.
by Calgranon May 14, 2008 9:00 PM
"Freedom of speech is fantastic! ... unless someone tries to use it on us. That's unacceptable." -Scientology
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT

 
ADVERTISEMENT